A Conversation with Machiavelli · Pair 10 of 39
Editor's summary Machiavelli ranks founders of religions and states highest and holds that a prince able to reform a corrupt city while keeping power merits no excuse if he does not. Guicciardini calls the title most true, but cases vary, and the author confounds the examples: whoever founds a tyranny from appetite to rule, like Caesar, merits utmost reproach, while a citizen driven to it to save himself merits much excuse, the more so where what is called liberty is not. Heirs to a tyranny merit less blame, and very few or perhaps none have left it without necessity; some legitimate kings govern justly, but he does not know which have made succession elective. Such things are painted more easily in books than done, and therefore those who do not do them merit less reproof.
Quanto sono laudabili i fondatori d'una Repubblica o d'un Regno, tanto quelli d'una tirannide sono vituperabili.
How much the founders of a republic or of a kingdom are laudable, so much those of a tyranny are vituperable.
Argument. A ranking of reputations. Most praised are the heads and orderers of religions; next, the founders of republics and kingdoms; then the captains who have expanded their kingdom or their fatherland; then men of letters, each by his degree; then everyone else, for his art. Against them stand the infamous and detestable: destroyers of religions, dissipaters of kingdoms and republics, enemies of virtù, letters and the arts. No one, mad or wise, wicked or good, offered the choice between the two kinds, would fail to praise the first and blame the second. The chapter rests on that agreement: everyone already knows which is to be praised.
Cross-reference. The ranking puts founders of religion above founders of states, which is where the next chapter goes: Numa, who gave Rome its religion, is set above Romulus in I.11, the next pair, and I.12 follows from it. The founders of republics and kingdoms are I.9's subject.
Argument. The turn. Nevertheless almost all, deceived by a false good and a false glory, go, voluntarily or ignorantly, among those who merit more blame than praise; able to make a republic or a kingdom with perpetual honour, they turn to tyranny. The case against them is made in the chooser's own currency: fame, glory, honour, security, quiet and satisfaction of spirit, which they flee, against infamy, disgrace, blame, danger and disquiet, which they incur. Security (sicurtà) is the thread to the end of the chapter.
Argument. The proof is conditional. It is impossible that private men in a republic, or men become its princes, who read the histories and set store by the memories of ancient things, should not wish, the private men, to be Scipios rather than Caesars, and the princes Agesilauses, Timoleons and Dions rather than Nabises, Phalarises and Dionysiuses: the histories vituperate the second and praise the first. And the good had no less authority than the tyrants, and far more security. By implication, those who choose tyranny have not read the histories, or have not set store by them.
History. Scipio Africanus, victor over Hannibal, who withdrew to Liternum rather, as the tradition has it, than set himself above the laws; Julius Caesar. Agesilaus II, king of Sparta; Timoleon of Corinth, who freed Syracuse from its tyrants and laid down his command; Dion, who drove out Dionysius II. Against them Nabis, tyrant of Sparta; Phalaris, tyrant of Acragas, proverbial for the bronze bull; and Dionysius of Syracuse (the elder and the younger both in view). Plutarch wrote lives of Timoleon, Dion and Agesilaus. The examples do not all bear out the claim of security: Dion was murdered in 354 BC, and Dionysius I died in power after nearly four decades.
Cross-reference. The private man who becomes prince "by fortune or virtù" is the case Guicciardini takes up first: the man who occupies a tyranny in a free fatherland Guicciardini .01. His reply turns Machiavelli's "private station" on the heir, for whom "to reduce oneself to private [station]" is the danger Guicciardini .02.
Argument. Caesar's glory is no counter-example. The writers who praise him were corrupted by his fortune and frightened by the length of the rule that bore his name, and could not speak freely of him. What free writers would say of him can be read in what writers say of Catiline, who only attempted what Caesar did; and the writers who could not blame Caesar, because of his power, praised Brutus, his enemy, instead. The one explicit verdict is a proportion: Caesar is the more detestable as the deed is worse than the wish.
History. Catiline's conspiracy of 63 BC, known chiefly through Sallust and Cicero; Marcus Junius Brutus, one of Caesar's assassins in 44 BC.
Cross-reference. Guicciardini agrees on Caesar, though he grants him "many other virtù": among the most inhuman and detestable, and named first among those who merit supreme reproof Guicciardini .01.
Argument. The imperial evidence, offered to the prince who has risen in a republic. The emperors who lived under the laws were defended by their customs, the people's benevolence and the senate's love, and needed no praetorians; the villainous were not saved by the armies of east and west from the enemies their lives made. The count: of twenty-six emperors from Caesar to Maximinus, sixteen killed, ten dead ordinarily. The exceptions are explained inside the same period: the good who were killed (Galba, Pertinax) were killed by the corruption their predecessors left in the soldiery; the villainous one who died ordinarily (Severus) was carried by a fortune and virtù few men join.
History. Machiavelli's sources for the emperors include the Latin lives of the Caesars and Herodian, whose history runs from the death of Marcus to 238, through the reign of Maximinus Thrax (235–238); the count is his own. Galba was killed in 69, Pertinax in 193 by the praetorians; Septimius Severus died at York in 211. The later part of this set, from Marcus to Maximinus, and the same judgement of Severus' virtù, is the matter of The Prince, chapter 19.
Argument. The lesson for ordering a kingdom. All the emperors who succeeded by inheritance were bad, except Titus; all who succeeded by adoption were good, the five from Nerva to Marcus; and when the rule fell again to heirs, it returned into its ruin. Let a prince compare the ages and choose in which he would wish to have been born, or to which he would wish to be appointed.
History. Nerva (96–98), himself chosen by the senate, not adopted, adopted Trajan; Trajan Hadrian (an adoption reported at his deathbed and doubted in antiquity); Hadrian Antoninus Pius; Antoninus Marcus Aurelius. Marcus was succeeded by his son Commodus (180–192), with whom, for Machiavelli, the ruin returns.
Cross-reference. Inheritance against adoption carries I.9's condition that the founder must not leave his authority hereditary. Guicciardini answers not with adoption but with succession by choice, his own design in I.2; he does not know which kings have made it so, and where the institution has lasted he believes necessity kept it more than the kings' will Guicciardini .03.
Argument. The two ages as a vision the prince "will see". Under the good: a secure prince among secure citizens, the senate with its authority, the magistracies with their honours, every licence and ambition extinguished, the golden times in which each may hold and defend his opinion. Under the others: wars, seditions, civil and external wars, Italy afflicted, Rome burned, the Capitol undone by its citizens, exiles, accusers rewarded, servants and freedmen corrupted against their lords and masters, virtù imputed as a capital sin. The catalogue ends in irony: then he will know how many debts Rome, Italy and the world have to Caesar.
History. Nearly the whole of the bad age, from "atrocious through wars" to "oppressed by their friends", follows Tacitus, Histories 1.2 (atrox proeliis, discors seditionibus, ipsa etiam pace saevum; four princes killed by the sword; the Capitol burned by its citizens; the sea full of exiles, the rocks stained with blood; nobility, wealth and honours treated as crimes; informers rewarded; slaves and freedmen corrupted against their masters; those without enemies destroyed by friends). Tacitus' subject is the years 69–96; Machiavelli extends it to every bad reign. The opinion freely held echoes Histories 1.1.
Cross-reference. "Debts" anticipates I.12's irony: the debt Italians owe the Church.
Argument. The close raises the stakes of I.9. A corrupt city is the greatest occasion of glory the heavens can give, to be reordered as Romulus did, not spoiled wholly as Caesar did. If ordering a city required laying down the principate, the prince who would not do it, so as not to fall from his degree, would merit some excuse; but since the principate can be kept and the city ordered, no excuse whatever is merited. Two paths: one secure in life and glorious after death, the other in continual straits and leaving an everlasting infamy.
Cross-reference. "Excuse" is I.9's word for Romulus. Guicciardini's last word falls on the case Machiavelli conceded: those who do not lay down a tyranny, or disinherit their posterity, merit "lesser reproof" Guicciardini .04, close to Machiavelli's "some excuse". His quarrel is with the condition, that the principate can be kept and the city ordered: his second and third cases say that tyrants are held back by danger and kings by love of their sons Guicciardini .02 Guicciardini .03.
Established from the 1824 edition (WIT-NM-DISC-1824-IA), page-image-backed, which governs. Collated against the 1554 Giglio printing, Venice (WIT-NM-DISC-1554-IA), which is comparison evidence only.
Paragraph divisions are editorial. The witness prints the chapter as one unbroken block.
infami e detestabili gli uomini destruttori delle Religioni ... utilità e onore alla umana generazione — 1824. The 1554 witness reads infami, & degni di maladitione gli huomini destruttori delle religioni ... utilita, & honore alle genti humane. Giglio's destroyers are 'worthy of malediction' rather than detestable, and the arts serve 'the human peoples' rather than the human generation. Same sense.
gli oziosi, i vili, e i da pochi — 1824. The 1554 witness reads gli otiosi, et uili. Giglio has no e i da pochi, the men of little account, and joins the idle and the vile in one class.
ma vedrebbero di lunga avervi avuto più sicurtà — 1824. The 1554 witness reads ma uedrebbono di gran lunga hauerui hauuto piu sicurta. Same sense: far more, by far more.
spauriti dalla lunghezza dell'Imperio ... E tanto è più detestabile Cesare — 1824. The 1554 witness reads spauentati dalla lunghezza dello imperio ... & tanto è piu uitupereuole Cesare. Giglio makes Caesar 'more vituperable', the rubric's word, where the 1824 has detestable, the word of .01.
talché non potendo biasimare quello per la sua potenza, e' celebrano il nimico suo — 1824. The 1554 witness reads tal che non potendo biasimare quello per la sua potenza, e celebrarono il nemico suo. Giglio puts the writers' praise of Brutus in the past (celebrarono), against the present of celebrono in the clause before.
Pongasi adunque innanzi un Principe i tempi da Nerva a Marco ... e che furono poi; e dipoi elegga — 1824. The 1554 witness reads Purgasi adunque inanzi un Prencipe è tempi da Nerua a Marco ... & che furono poi, elegga. Purgasi is almost certainly a misprint for Pongasi (the page's catchword reads è tempo); Giglio has no e dipoi.
Se considererà dipoi tritamente i tempi — 1824. The 1554 witness reads Se considera dipoi minutamente i tempi. Same sense: minutely; Giglio's verb is present.
come sono loro proposte due vie — 1824. The 1554 witness reads come sono loro preposte due uie. Proposed to them, set before them: the same sense.
l'altra li fa vivere in continue angustie — 1824. The 1554 witness reads l'altra gli fa uiuere in continoue molestie. Giglio's second path is one of continual vexations, the 1824's of continual straits.
Orthography, capitalization, word division and punctuation follow the governing witness throughout; no reading is hybridized between witnesses.
Capi e ordinatori delle Religioni. "Heads and orderers of religions": capo and ordinatore as the glossary has them. The ranking runs founders of religions, of republics and kingdoms, captains, men of letters, and then everyone else, each praised for his art. Sono celebri (captains) is "renowned", sono celebrati (men of letters) "celebrated".
delle virtù. Virtù in the plural, the capacities that the destroyers are enemies of, set beside letters and the arts; the loan-word cannot show the number. Elsewhere in the chapter virtù is a quality of men: the private man who becomes prince per fortuna o virtù (.03), Severus' fortuna e virtù (.05), and the virtù honoured in the good age and imputed as a capital sin in the bad (.07).
i vili, e i da pochi. "The vile, and the men of little account": vile in its older sense, base, wanting in spirit; men da poco, of little worth. The 1554 edition has no e i da pochi (NM-DISC-I10-D002).
sì tristo, o sì buono. "So wicked, or so good": tristo is "wicked" (D03). Scellerati, twice of emperors (.05), is "villainous", and malvagia vita "vicious life", so that the three words stay apart from rei costumi, "evil customs".
dipoi. "Afterwards", in all four places (.01, .02, .06, .07), so that "then" stays adunque's (D74).
incorrono. "They incur": a currere compound, the running-into that answers fuggono, "they flee", in the same period (D01, D171).
vituperio. "Disgrace" (D26). The adjective and the verb keep the root: vituperabili "vituperable" in the rubric, vituperati "vituperated" (.03).
gradi. "Degrees" (glossary grado): each man of letters according to his degree (.01), the degrees of the praised and the blamed (.02), and the principate's height (cadere di quel grado, "fall from that degree", .08).
quelli tali privati. "Those private men": the subject is resumed after the long conditional, as Machiavelli resumes it, with a second "that" (D136).
facessero capitale. "Set store by": fare capitale di, to count on, to treat as a stock. "Make capital of" now means to exploit.
Scipios and Caesars. Scipio Africanus, who held no power beyond the republic's, against Julius Caesar; among princes, Agesilaus II of Sparta, Timoleon of Corinth (who freed Syracuse and laid down his command) and Dion of Syracuse, against Nabis, tyrant of Sparta, Phalaris of Acragas and Dionysius of Syracuse. The plurals are Machiavelli's (Agesilai, Nabidi).
Né sia alcuno che s'inganni. "Nor let there be anyone who deceives himself": reflexive, against the true passive of .02 (ingannati da).
quanto più è da biasimare quello che ha fatto, che quello che ha voluto fare un male. He who has done an ill is more to be blamed than he who wished to do it: Caesar did what Catiline only attempted. The English moves "an ill" to the first clause, where it is understood; the Italian sets it at the end, after the second verb. Brutus is Marcus Junius Brutus.
Imperio. D124 occurrence by occurrence. "Rule" for the sovereignty of the Caesars (la lunghezza dell'Imperio, il quale reggendosi sotto quel nome, .04) and for what passes by inheritance (succederono all'Imperio, l'Imperio cadde negli eredi, .06); "empire" where Rome changes its form (poi che Roma fu diventata Imperio, .05), as I.5 fare uno Imperio.
The emperors. The good: Titus, Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius and Marcus Aurelius; "those five from Nerva to Marcus" are the adoptive emperors, and Titus the one good heir. The bad: Caligula, Nero, Vitellius. Galba and Pertinax were killed by the soldiery; Severus is Septimius Severus. The count of twenty-six from Caesar to Maximinus (Maximinus Thrax, 235–238) is Machiavelli's own; the 1554 edition prints it in numerals.
morirono ordinariamente. "Died ordinarily": by the ordinary way, not by the sword, as ordinariamente in I.7 (D151).
le quali due cose pochi uomini accompagnano. "Which two things few men accompany". The Italian can be construed either way: few men join great fortune to great virtù, or the two things accompany few men. The English keeps the order and with it the first construction; the sense is close.
in quelli governati da' buoni. "In those governed by the good": the times governed by good emperors.
The two ages. Machiavelli sets the vision out as absolutes with the predicate first (ripieno di pace e di giustizia il Mondo, desolati gli antichi templi); the English keeps that order throughout .07.
i Magistrati coi suoi onori. "The magistracies with their honours": the offices, as D93.
spenta. "Extinguished": rancour, licence, corruption and ambition put out, as a fire.
dove ciascuno può tenere e difendere quella opinione che vuole. "Where each can hold and defend that opinion which he wishes". Cf. Tacitus, Histories 1.1, of the times of Nerva and Trajan: ubi sentire quae velis et quae sentias dicere licet, "when one may think what one wishes and say what one thinks".
peccato capitale. "A capital sin": a crime punishable by death, in the word for sin.
quanti obblighi Roma, Italia, e il Mondo abbia con Cesare. "How many debts": obbligo is "debt" (D17), and ironic, as in I.12.
se e' sarà nato d'uomo. "If he be born of man": if he is a human being at all. The future perfect is conjectural.
si sbigottirà da. "Will be frightened away from": the da separates.
ordinarla. The city, not the principate, which is masculine; the English supplies "[the city]" in .08, where the verbs are impersonal.
continue angustie. "Continual straits". The 1554 edition reads continoue molestie, "continual vexations" (NM-DISC-I10-D009).
Quanto sono laudabili i fondatori d'una repubblica o d'uno regno, tanto quelli d'una tirannide sono vituperabili
How much the founders of a republic or of a kingdom are laudable, so much those of a tyranny are vituperable
Argument. He grants the title, most true, restating it in his own order (kingdoms first) and in his own word (blame for vituperation). Then the charge: the cases are various and the author confounds the examples. The first case is the man who occupies a tyranny in a free fatherland. Seldom does he have such necessity, or a necessity not of his own making, so that any colour of justification remains to him, and such men, Caesar among them, for all his other virtù, are most inhuman and detestable. But inside this case he opens another. Sometimes liberties are so disordered and cities so divided that a citizen who cannot otherwise save himself is driven to seek the tyranny or to join whoever seeks it; he would be laudable to put the fatherland before his safety, but since that love is more desired than found, he merits to be much excused, the more so if the government he goes against is disordered, for many are called liberties that are not. Florence is the example, in the first person: good citizens persecuted since the change of the state, and at the coming of the prince of Orange caught between the Eight's order to stay under pain of rebellion and the danger of staying, so that necessity has led them to desire the change of a state that is tyrannical under the name of liberty, or else to lose fatherland and substance. Justification and excuse stay apart: none for the usurper, much for the citizen. Then the verdict on the first case is restated: whoever makes a tyranny from appetite of dominating merits supreme reproof, Caesar, Phalaris, Pisistratus and the like, each more or less infamous by his cruelty and his other virtù.
History. The Medici were driven from Florence in May 1527, after the sack of Rome, and the popular government restored. In 1529 Clement VII and Charles V made peace at Barcelona, and from October the imperial army under Philibert of Chalon, prince of Orange, besieged the city; he was killed at Gavinana in August 1530, days before Florence surrendered. The Eight (the Otto di Guardia) were the magistracy of police and security. Guicciardini, who had served the Medici pope, left the city and was declared a rebel; the citizens of his example are, it seems, men of his own party. The present tenses (è tirannico, ha condotti) suggest the reply was written while the siege government stood. "Of '26" is as both editions print it; the change came in 1527.
Cross-reference. Il titulo is the rubric, which Machiavelli's first paragraph unfolds Machiavelli .01; sommo biasimo answers sommamente vituperati Machiavelli .03. Machiavelli named Caesar against Scipio, with Catiline, and among the emperors; Guicciardini keeps him with the makers of tyranny and adds Pisistratus, whom Machiavelli named in I.2 as the tyranny that arose under Solon's laws. "Excuse" is the word of I.9 and of Machiavelli's last lines here, "some excuse", "no excuse whatever" Machiavelli .08; Guicciardini gives it, much of it, to a man Machiavelli does not consider: the citizen who goes towards a tyranny out of necessity.
Argument. The second case: the heir to a tyranny. He merits less blame for continuing in it than those who founded it, and would merit the more praise for leaving it, since he is less a debtor for a usurpation he did not commit. Very few or perhaps none have left it without necessity, and no marvel. He cannot know the glory of putting the fatherland in liberty, since, nourished in power, he judges power the supreme good; and besides, the danger can hold him back even if he had the will: a tyranny is hard to acquire and keep without many enmities, so to reduce himself to private, or leave his sons private, seems dangerous, peoples being ungrateful and new liberties commonly disordered. Sulla, who laid down a power he had seized himself, not inherited, is the rare example, and he could do it more securely because his faction kept the government, so that he lived secure and his acts and memory were kept after him.
History. Sulla, dictator from 82/81 BC, gave up the dictatorship and retired to private life by 79, and died in 78; much of his legislation outlived him.
Cross-reference. Machiavelli's argument was that security lay with the good, the tyrants living in danger Machiavelli .03 Machiavelli .05; Guicciardini answers that for the tyrant's heir the danger lies in laying down. "To reduce oneself to private [station]" restates Machiavelli's "private station" Machiavelli .03, and the heir's sons answer the emperors who succeeded by inheritance Machiavelli .06.
Argument. The third case: kings and princes legitimately created, as at Sparta and in early Rome, or made legitimate by time. Some with unbound authority yet govern justly and merit the name of good prince; but he does not know which have brought the kingdom to the perfection that ought to be, succession by choice rather than by inheritance. Where such an institution has existed, he believes some necessity has kept it more than the will of those who reigned, for the love of fathers for their sons is too great, and their wish to leave their house's memory illustrious not small.
History. Sparta had two hereditary kings, of the Agiad and Eurypontid houses. Rome's kings after Romulus were chosen, after an interregnum, by the people with the senate's sanction.
Cross-reference. Machiavelli's proof was the adoptive emperors from Nerva to Marcus Machiavelli .06; Guicciardini answers not with adoption but with election. The acts are distinct: he grants (pure), suspends (non so), and believes (credo). In his reply to I.2 his own design had the head of the government perpetual and per elezione, non per successione, and he faulted the Lacedaemonian kings as always of one family and by succession: here he does not know which king will choose what he himself prescribed, and where it has been chosen he credits necessity more than will.
Argument. The conclusion, by però. Tyrants laying down tyrannies and kings ordering their kingdoms against their posterity are thoughts painted more readily in books and imaginations than executed in fact; as often as private men reason about them, so rarely are they done. So those who do not do these things merit lesser reproof. The figure is the rubric's own proportion, turned against the book.
Cross-reference. "In books": the Discorsi, presumably, among them. Machiavelli granted "some excuse" to the prince who would not order the city if ordering meant laying down the principate, and "no excuse whatever" where it did not Machiavelli .08. Guicciardini's lesser reproof falls on the first case, close to Machiavelli's "some excuse"; what he denies is that the second is ever met, since tyrants are held back by danger and kings by love of their sons. Compare his reply to I.9, where the founder who lays down his authority is supremely laudable and perhaps Lycurgus alone.
Established from Canestrini 1857, Opere inedite vol. 1, pp. 1–65 (WIT-FG-CONS-1857-CANESTRINI) — the editio princeps, which governs. Collated against Palmarocchi 1933 (WIT-FG-CONS-1933-PALMAROCCHI): page images and the Wikisource transcription consulted as collation evidence, not reproduced (LICENSE §5).
fondatori della tirannide Ma perché → fondatori della tirannide. Ma perché (FG-CONS.1.10.01). No stop in the impression (A doubtful, B none); a capital follows; the 1933 edition prints it. D67.
come sospetti I quali → come sospetti. I quali (FG-CONS.1.10.01). As C001. D67.
lasciare la tirannide Sanza che → lasciare la tirannide. Sanza che (FG-CONS.1.10.02). A faint mark, not a stop, both readers; the 1933 edition prints one. D67.
piene di disordini E se → piene di disordini. E se (FG-CONS.1.10.02). As C003. D67.
per elezione E se in alcuno regno → per elezione. E se in alcuno regno (FG-CONS.1.10.03). Nothing at line end, both readers; the 1933 edition prints it. D67.
[È] vero che qualche volta ... [È] altro il caso di quelli. The 1857 witness reads E vero che qualche volta ... E altro il caso di quelli. The 1933 witness reads È vero che qualche volta ... È altro el caso di quelli. Canestrini prints the verb without its accent at both, and as printed neither period has a finite verb. Emended as his I.3, I.7, I.8 and I.9 were (D114, D144, D157, D167; D181).
sono certo inumanissimi e detestabili — 1857. The 1933 witness reads sono certo immanissimi e detestabili. Most inhuman, against most monstrous. Both readers read Canestrini's inumanissimi; it construes, so D38.
come sospetti. I quali la necessità ha condotti — 1857. The 1933 witness reads come sospetti. E' quali la necessitá ha condotti. The relative with Canestrini's article, against Palmarocchi's Florentine plural e'. Same sense.
che meritano manco biasimo continuando in essa — 1857. The 1933 witness reads che meritano manco biasimo continuando in esso. Canestrini's feminine takes the tyranny; Palmarocchi's masculine can take the case or the state. The English follows Canestrini: 'continuing in it'.
credo ve l'abbia conservata — 1857. The 1933 witness reads credo che ve l'abbia conservata. Palmarocchi has the complementiser; same sense.
né piccolo è quello che li porta a lasciare illustre la memoria — 1857. The 1933 witness reads né piccolo è quello che si porta a lasciare illustre la memoria. In Canestrini the love bears the fathers on; in Palmarocchi it is the love one bears to leaving the memory illustrious. Both construe; D38.
che e' tiranni deponghino le tirannidi ... e nelle immaginazioni degli uomini — 1857. The 1933 witness reads che e' tiranni deponghino le tirannide ... e nelle immaginazione degli uomini. Palmarocchi keeps the old plurals in -e. Same sense.
sotto pena di rebellione — 1857. The 1933 witness reads sotto pena [di] rebellione. Palmarocchi brackets the preposition as his supply; Canestrini prints it.
Orthography, capitalization, word division and punctuation follow the governing witness throughout; no reading is hybridized between witnesses.
Il titulo di questo Discorso. "The title of this Discourse": Machiavelli's rubric, which the reply names, grants and restates in its own words, with kingdoms now before republics, and biasimo, blame, for vituperabili (Machiavelli .01). The order matters, because .03 turns to kings. Titulo is Guicciardini's Latin form; the 1933 edition prints titolo.
somma, sommo. "Supreme": supreme praise, blame, injustice, reproof, the supreme good, as Machiavelli's sommamente vituperati, "supremely vituperated" (Machiavelli .03).
e lo autore confonde gli esempli. "And the author confounds the examples": the reply's charge. Machiavelli draws his examples indifferently from a citizen who made a tyranny in a free city (Caesar), from tyrants (Nabis, Phalaris, Dionysius), and from emperors who came to rule by inheritance or by adoption. Guicciardini separates the man who makes a tyranny, the man who inherits one, and the legitimate king.
rare volte occorre. "It seldom occurs": rare volte as D97, and occorrere as D01.
talmente che gli resti colore alcuno. "So that there remain to him any colour": alcuno under the rare volte of the governing clause, any colour at all. Both readers were unsure of a letter in resti; it is read with the 1933 edition (D182).
inumanissimi. "Most inhuman". The 1933 edition reads immanissimi, "most monstrous" (FG-CONS-I10-D002).
le forme delle libertà. "The forms of the liberties": the plural, of free governments.
la salute sua particulare. "His particular safety": his own good against the fatherland's, as FG I.8 sdegni particulari, "particular indignations" (D93).
si desidera negli uomini più presto che la si truovi. "Is desired in men rather than it is found": più presto ... che as D135.
merita essere assai scusato. "He merits to be much excused": excuse, Machiavelli's word for the founder in I.9 and for the prince in the last lines of I.10 (Machiavelli .08).
perché molte sono chiamate spesso libertà che non sono. "For many are often called liberties that are not": governments called free.
The example of Florence. The Medici were driven out in May 1527 and the popular government restored. "Of '26" is as both editions print it, and the reading stands; Canestrini's note, which is his and is not carried, dates the change to 1527. In 1529, after the peace between the pope and the emperor, the prince of Orange (Philibert of Chalon) led the imperial army against the city. The order to stay, Guicciardini says, was made by the Eight (the Otto di Guardia, the magistracy of police and security). Guicciardini himself left Florence in 1529 and was afterwards declared a rebel.
sotto pena di rebellione. "Under pain of rebellion": of being declared rebels, which carried the confiscation of goods.
sostenuti come sospetti. "Detained as suspects": sostenere in its period sense, to hold in custody.
e almanco con certezza. "And at the least with certainty": both readers were unsure of the letter; it is read e with the 1933 edition (D183).
uno Stato che sotto nome di libertà è tirannico. The popular government is the tyranny: the citizens are led to desire its change, not drawn towards tyranny.
lasciarsi ... tòrre la patria e le facultà. "Let themselves ... have the fatherland and their substance taken away": tòrre, take away (D131). Facultà is here what one owns: "substance", not "capacity", which is the word's other sense (D198).
[È] vero, [È] altro. Canestrini prints E without the accent at both; as printed neither period has a finite verb, and the 1933 edition prints È. Emended (D181); the English follows the emended text.
Pisistrato. Pisistratus, tyrant of Athens, whom Machiavelli does not name here. Guicciardini adds him to Caesar and Phalaris.
la usorono. "Used it": the tyranny.
quanto manco sono debitori di cancellare il peccato d'averla usurpata. "As they are less debtors to cancel the sin of having usurped it": the heir did not commit the usurpation, so laying the tyranny down is more freely given. "Debtors" has no Italian echo of Machiavelli's obblighi, "debts" (D17).
pochissimi o forse nessuno. "Very few or perhaps none": returns as pochissimi e forse nessuno in the reply's last line, with o become e.
nessuna altra ragione. Read nessuna with the 1933 edition (D184).
Sanza che. "Besides that": a further cause, in a period left without a main clause.
n'avessi volontà. "Had the will to it": volontà, will (D117). The reply spells it voluntà in .03; both are kept as printed.
ridursi privato. "To reduce oneself to private [station]": Machiavelli's in istato privato, "in private station" (Machiavelli .03).
Sulla. Lucius Cornelius Sulla, dictator from 82/81 BC, gave up the dictatorship and retired to private life by 79 BC, and died in 78. Much of his legislation outlived him; the tribunes' powers he had cut were restored in 70 BC.
e' re di Lacedemone, e' primi re romani. "The kings of Lacedaemon": Sparta's two hereditary kings. "Lacedaemon" as FG I.2. The first Roman kings were chosen, not born to the throne: of his two examples of kings created legitimately, one is hereditary and one elective.
la autorità sciolta. "The authority unbound": not bound by laws or other magistrates.
si truova pure qualcuno. "There is found yet some one": pure concessive, granting before the ma.
ma io non so quali che riduchino. "But I do not know which [of them] reduce": non so, the suspension of the four acts (problematic.md). He does not know which kings do it, and the next period allows that some kingdom may have had the institution.
per elezione. "By choice": elezione is "choice" throughout the edition, including the choice of kings (glossary). It answers Machiavelli's emperors per adozione (Machiavelli .06).
portano, porta. "Bear", "bears them on": the love fathers bear their sons, and the love that bears them on to leave their house's memory illustrious. The 1933 edition reads che si porta (FG-CONS-I10-D006).
anzi. "Indeed": correcting upward after an affirmative (D147).
quanto ... tanto. The rubric's proportion, turned to measure how often private men reason about these things against how rarely they are done.
minore reprensione. "Lesser reproof": not excuse, and not praise. It falls on those who do not lay down a tyranny or disinherit their posterity, the case to which Machiavelli granted "some excuse"; his "no excuse whatever" was for the prince who could keep the principate and order the city (Machiavelli .08).
bisogna. "It is required": the edition's rendering of the impersonal bisognare, in every tense (D260); the reasons are in the note on bisogni at Machiavelli I.2.