A Conversation with Machiavelli · Pair 12 of 39
Editor's summary Machiavelli holds that a state must keep its religion uncorrupted, and charges the Roman Church with destroying Italy's devotion by its court's wicked examples and, too weak to rule Italy yet strong enough to keep it divided, with causing its ruin. Guicciardini says no ill can be spoken of the Roman court that it does not deserve worse, and believes the Church has kept Italy from becoming a monarchy, but he does not know whether that was felicity or infelicity. Under a republic, one city's rule would have been calamity for the rest; divided Italy, though it has suffered, has had flourishing cities a republic would have denied it, so he judges such a monarchy more unhappy than happy. Nor has Italy ever been easily brought under one rule. Therefore, if the Church has opposed monarchies, he does not readily concur that this has been Italy's misfortune.
Di quanta importanza sia tenere conto della Religione, e come la Italia per esserne mancata mediante la Chiesa Romana, è rovinata.
Of how much importance it is to take account of religion, and how Italy, for having been wanting in it through the Roman Church, is ruined.
Argument. The chapter's premise, and it is functional before it is pious: a religion lives by "some principal order of its own", and the proof is what happened when that order failed. The pagan system hung on the oracles; once they were seen to speak for the powerful, belief went, and with it the disposition to keep "every good order". The same test is applied to the Christian religion Machiavelli .04 and underlies the first charge against the Roman court Machiavelli .05.
History. The charge that the oracles spoke for the powerful is ancient. Cicero reports Demosthenes' complaint that the Pythia — the oracle of Delphi — "philippized", prophesying to suit Philip of Macedon (De divinatione II.118). The governing witness names Delos here, the 1554 printing Delphi; see the translator's notes.
Argument. The prescription: princes should favour and increase whatever arises in religion's favour "even though they should judge them false", and the more so the more prudent and the more "knowing in natural things" they are. Understanding nature is a reason to sponsor miracles, not to expose them. Machiavelli states it without apology, and calls those who practise it wise.
History. Veii, Rome's Etruscan neighbour, fell to Camillus, traditionally in 396 BC. Livy tells the story of Juno's image (V.22): young men chosen to carry the goddess to Rome entered her temple with reverence, and when one asked — whether moved by the god or in youthful jest — visne Romam ire, Iuno?, the others cried that she had nodded; a voice saying she was willing was, he adds, a later addition to the tale. Machiavelli's Latin is not Livy's, and he gives the scene to soldiers in the act of sacking. The reverence he keeps, because it is his evidence.
Argument. The explanation is psychological: men full of religion hear the answer they had "perhaps presupposed". Camillus and the princes did not invent the miracle; they did to it what Machiavelli .02 prescribes, in the same words — favoured and increased it.
Term. "The Christian republic" is Christendom — the respublica Christiana of medieval usage — not a state; "the Christian states and republics" in the same sentence are its members. The Giver is presumably Christ.
Argument. The turn. The rule of Machiavelli .01 is applied to Christianity: measure the present use against the foundations, and the result is a correlation — the nearer a people is to the Roman Church, the less religion it has.
Term. "The scourge" (il flagello) echoes the Florentine prophetic preaching of the 1490s, Savonarola's above all, which announced a scourge coming upon Italy before the Church's renewal.
Cross-reference. Guicciardini answers none of this; see Guicciardini .01.
Argument. Two charges, numbered and of different kinds. The first is moral: the court's example has destroyed devotion, and without religion "the contrary" of every good is presupposed. The second, "greater still", is political: the Church has kept Italy divided. The debt Italians owe the Church is ironic both times.
Term. "I wish to discourse … those reasons which occur to me": discorrere and occorrere, two compounds of currere, to run. Guicciardini's reply turns on a third, concorrere Guicciardini .03. Whether he meant the echo cannot be shown; the words share a root, and this edition keeps all three in English so that the reader can hear it.
Argument. The mechanism of the second charge, in two halves that must be read together: the Church was not powerful enough, nor of enough virtù, to unify Italy itself, and not so weak that it could not summon "a powerful one" to defend it against anyone in Italy who had grown too powerful. The claim that no province was ever "united or happy" except under one republic or one prince is the premise Guicciardini takes apart Guicciardini .02.
History. Charlemagne, at the call of Pope Adrian I, conquered the Lombard kingdom in 773–74. In Machiavelli's own time the League of Cambrai (December 1508), which Julius II joined in 1509, broke Venetian power on the mainland at Agnadello; in 1512 the French were driven out of Lombardy with Swiss arms.
Cross-reference. Guicciardini restates the mechanism and grants it Guicciardini .01, with two shifts: the Church's strength becomes the credit religion gave it, its weakness the lack of arms of its own; and it summons foreign princes against whoever would oppress Italy, not to defend itself.
Argument. The experiment that cannot be run, proposed anyway: move the Roman court to Switzerland, and its customs would disorder that province faster than any other accident could. The Swiss are chosen because they alone, today, live "according to the ancients" in religion and in military orders.
Cross-reference. "Prey … of powerful barbarians" is answered in effect: the barbarian inundations came more in the time of the Roman empire than otherwise Guicciardini .03.
Established from the 1824 edition (WIT-NM-DISC-1824-IA), page-image-backed, which governs. Collated against the 1554 Giglio printing, Venice (WIT-NM-DISC-1554-IA), which is comparison evidence only.
Paragraph divisions are editorial. The witness prints the chapter as one unbroken block.
hanno meno Religione → hanno meno religione (paragraph .04). 1824 witness, printed p. 64, final line. Lower case is unambiguous at the page, and the same page prints Religione capitalised four times (ripieni di Religione; nelle Religioni; La quale Religione; Capo della Religione nostra). An earlier transcription regularised the single exception away; the second, independent reading caught it, and the page image confirms it.
nelle Religioni eziandio false → nelle Religioni, eziandio false (paragraph .02). 1824 witness, printed p. 64. The comma is printed.
come la Italia per esserne mancata mediante la Chiesa Romana, è rovinata — 1824. The 1554 witness reads come la Italia, per esserne ella mancata, mediante la Chiesa Romana è rovinata. 1824 governs punctuation and wording; 1554 variant remains recorded.
l'oracolo di Delo — 1824. The 1554 witness reads l'oracolo di Delfo. Both are intelligible; governing witness retained without silent harmonization.
gli augumentano — 1824. The 1554 witness reads gli aumentano. Historical spelling of governing witness retained.
vis venire Romam? — 1824. The 1554 witness reads Vis venire Romam. 1824 question punctuation retained; Latin span annotated.
declinazione — 1824. The 1554 witness reads declinatione. Governing-witness orthography retained.
voglio contro ad essa discorrere... due potentissime... La prima è, che per gli esempj rei di quella Corte... — 1824. The 1554 witness reads forse si potria dire il contrario, havendo rispetto però a quelli, che in essa Chiesa Romana non osservano... Et oltre a questo è, che la Chiesa ha tenuto.... The two editions transmit different argument structures. This edition follows the governing 1824 witness, which brings two charges against the Roman Church; the 1554 reading is recorded here as a substantive variant.
Orthography, capitalization, word division and punctuation follow the governing witness throughout; no reading is hybridized between witnesses.
.04, hanno meno religione. The witness capitalises Religione throughout this chapter — four times on the same page — and drops the capital at exactly this phrase, where Machiavelli says that those nearest the Roman Church have least religion. English cannot carry the distinction. Whether the compositor meant it or not, the page prints it. (Source v0.2.1; the reading was recovered by the dual cold pass and adjudicated on the page image, 2026-09-18.)
.01, l'oracolo di Delo. The governing 1824 witness reads Delos; the 1554 Giglio comparison witness reads Delfo, Delphi.
.03, vis venire Romam?. — "Do you wish to come to Rome?" Left in Latin, as the witness prints it, in italic.
.06, virtù. Left untranslated. Machiavelli sets it beside potente in the same clause — the Church was neither powerful enough nor of such virtù — so it cannot be simply power, and it is plainly not moral virtue.
bisognerebbe. "It would be required": the edition's rendering of the impersonal bisognare, in every tense (D260); the reasons are in the note on bisogni at Machiavelli I.2. The Italian period changes construction after chi volesse, and the English keeps the break.
Di quanta importanza sia tenere conto della religione, e come la Italia, per esserne mancata mediante la Chiesa romana, è rovinata
Of how much importance it is to take account of religion, and how Italy, for having been wanting in it through the Roman Church, is ruined Canestrini prints a rubric over the Considerazione, in his own wording — lower-case religione, a comma after la Italia, lower-case romana — rather than reprinting the 1824 Discorsi heading.
Argument. Guicciardini passes over Machiavelli's whole theory of religion Machiavelli .01–Machiavelli .04 in silence and begins with the court. There he goes further than Machiavelli: nothing said against it can be enough. Then, with credo — assent — he grants the causal claim of the second charge and restates its mechanism, with two shifts Machiavelli .06.
History. He had spent a decade in the service of the Medici popes: governor of Modena and Reggio under Leo X, then president of the Romagna and lieutenant-general of the papal army under Clement VII. In the Ricordi (C 28) he voices the same loathing in his own person, and adds what this page leaves out: no one dislikes the ambition, avarice and softness of priests more than he, but his standing with several popes obliged him, for his own interest, to love their greatness — and but for that he would have loved Martin Luther as himself.
Argument. Non so già — doubt, pressed. Machiavelli wrote "one republic or one prince" as if they were the same remedy Machiavelli .06. Guicciardini splits them. Had a single republic ruled Italy, it would have been glory to the name of Italy and happiness to the ruling city, and calamity to every other, because republics do not share the fruits of their liberty with their subjects. The paragraph is contrary to fact: no republic had ruled Italy since Rome.
Term. Felicità and infelicità are civic conditions, of a city or of a province, not private states of mind.
Argument. The counterweights, in order. Division brought calamities, but the barbarian invasions came more under the Roman empire than since — compare Machiavelli's "prey … of powerful barbarians" Machiavelli .07. Division also brought flourishing cities that a single ruling republic would not have allowed. A kingdom is different — "more common to all the subjects" — which grants Machiavelli's France Machiavelli .06 and denies it to Italy for reasons older than the Church: fate, the complexion of the people, a natural appetite for liberty. No power but Rome, he believes, ever held all of Italy, and Rome held it by virtù and violence together; compare the virtù Machiavelli says the Church lacked Machiavelli .06.
Term. Complessione is humoral: the temperament of a people as a mixture of qualities, "tempered" so that they have wit and force.
Argument. The close. If the Church opposed monarchy, Guicciardini does "not readily concur" that this was Italy's unhappiness, since it kept Italy in the way of living most in keeping with its most ancient usage and inclination. He declines Machiavelli's conclusion; his own is hedged. For concorrere against Machiavelli's discorrere and occorrere, see Machiavelli .05.
Established from Canestrini 1857, Opere inedite vol. 1, pp. 1–65 (WIT-FG-CONS-1857-CANESTRINI) — the editio princeps, which governs. Collated against Palmarocchi 1933 (WIT-FG-CONS-1933-PALMAROCCHI): page images and the Wikisource transcription consulted as collation evidence, not reproduced (LICENSE §5).
Paragraph divisions are editorial. The witness prints the chapter as one unbroken block.
non ebbe patito — 1857. The 1933 witness reads non [ar]ebbe patito. Canestrini prints the plain indicative, "did not suffer"; Palmarocchi prints the counterfactual, "would not have suffered", which is the reading the argument seems to want. This edition follows its governing witness even where the comparison witness reads better, and records the alternative here.
ché io reputo che — 1857. The 1933 witness reads che io reputo che. Canestrini accents the first "che", making it causal: "for I reckon that". Without the accent it can be read as consecutive, "so that".
in varii tempi — 1857. The 1933 witness reads in vari tempi. Canestrini spelling retained.
Orthography, capitalization, word division and punctuation follow the governing witness throughout; no reading is hybridized between witnesses.
virtù, twice. Left untranslated, as in the facing chapter. Guicciardini uses it of the Romans' conquering capacity and then of what failed in the emperors — neither moral virtue nor simply force, and the same word must carry both.
facilmente, twice, sixteen words apart. perderono facilmente and non concorro facilmente. The English holds one word for both — "readily" — because the repetition is Guicciardini's and the hinge sits inside it.
milita. Guicciardini's non milita is the Latinate argumentative sense: the reason has no force, does not apply. Modern English "militate" survives almost only in "militate against", which pulls the opposite way, so the cognate is not kept here.
imperio and imperadori. "Empire" and "emperors": the rhyme in mancò la virtù degli imperadori ... perderono ... lo imperio d'Italia carries over. Sotto uno imperio and altro imperio stay "one rule" and "any other rule" (D30): there the word is rule over Italy as such, set against the many states it was divided into (D124).
poteva ... era ... non avevano. Guicciardini's hypothesis in .02 is in the imperfect indicative throughout, the ordinary Italian idiom for a condition contrary to fact. The English is counterfactual throughout: a single republic ruling Italy, as none had since Rome, and what it would have done to the other cities.
non ebbe patito. Canestrini prints the plain indicative: calamities which under a single dominion Italy had not suffered — a claim about what the one Roman dominion spared it, which the benché clause then qualifies. Palmarocchi 1933 reads non [ar]ebbe patito, the counterfactual would not have suffered, and it is the reading Guicciardini's argument seems to want. This edition follows its governing witness even where the comparison witness reads better, and shows the alternative here. An earlier draft of this English was made from Palmarocchi's text under Canestrini's name and had the counterfactual.
ché io reputo che. Canestrini accents the first che and leaves the second bare: a causal conjunction and then a complementiser. The English carries both — "for I deem that" — where the earlier draft, following a text without the accent, had "so that".
consuetudine and costume. Two words: "usage" here, "custom" at il costume delle republiche in the paragraph before. Kept apart because Guicciardini keeps them apart, and because consuetudine sits among his non-deterministic causes — fate, complexion, inclination, long usage — which are not to be modernised into national character.
vituperii. The two independent readers of Canestrini p. 27 divided on the third letter. One read vituperii; the other, at high magnification, saw a plain vertical without the crossbar and foot of this fount's t and read a foul sort, viluperii. At the scan's resolution the question cannot be settled. The edition prints the word, vituperii; the sense is the same either way.
The close. The witness prints no full stop after inclinazione sua, and neither text here supplies one. The period ends as the page ends it. Two other sentence-final stops in this unit, displaced in the witness by Canestrini's note references, are supplied and declared.
bisognato. "It has been required": the edition's rendering of the impersonal bisognare, in every tense (D260); the reasons are in the note on bisogni at Machiavelli I.2.